Lyndon B. W. Brand And Lbj s Written By Robert Dallek

When we were first assigned to read select pages from Flawed Giant: Lyndon Johnson and his Times, as well as Reagan, the Life, I believed that I had a solid foundation in the history of these two men and their presidencies. I did not expect to learn a whole lot more about these presidents. However, throughout the reading of the two biographies, I found myself discovering more and more about these men, their personal lives, their accomplishments, and much more I never knew about them. These biographies, Reagan’s written by H. W. Brands and LBJ’s written by Robert Dallek, dive deep into each president’s backgrounds, and into their years in office. Each of these presidents was faced with matters of national and global concern during their†¦show more content†¦Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty also stemmed from his passing of landmark bills to achieve his Great Society. LBJ was a fine president who did innumerable things while in office to help the Amer ican people; However, with every man comes flaws. For LBJ, these flaws can be seen more in his personal life than through his policy making as President. Lyndon B. Johnson was an intimidating man, and was used to making things go according to his plan. He generally would do anything possible to make what he wanted happen, and would sometimes use immoral tactics to do so. The â€Å"Johnson Treatment† as it was named, was Johnson’s most popular tactic of intimidation. He would tower over whomever he was speaking, using intimidating words and well as physical contact to get what he wanted from them. His time in the House, Senate, and White House were all filled with this type of behavior to make things get done his way. Although his time spent in political office was marked with scandal, and sometimes immoral tactics, overall Lyndon B. Johnson did many great things for the American people and this country. His influence as president from 1963-1969 can still be felt to thi s day, and Robert Dallek does an excellent job of detailing these successes in Flawed Giant: Lyndon Johnson and his Times. On the other hand,

The Examination of Complicated Relationships between The...

Author of many children’s books, Karen Mueller Coombs has illustrated that, â€Å"often the right path is the one that may be hardest for you to follow. But the hardest path is the one that will make you grow as a human being† (â€Å"Karen Mueller Coombs†, 2013). This statement explains how regardless of what circumstances or experiences a person goes through in life, an individual’s character will grow and evolve. This concept is demonstrated in The Kite Runner and The Flying Troutmans. Both main characters display that despite being brought up in different situations, their past choices evolve their characters. Their family complications are decreased and their family foundation becomes stronger. In The Kite Runner, Amir is a young Pashtun boy†¦show more content†¦Even though Hattie has always felt unwelcomed by her sister since birth, she continues to try to rebuild their relationship. This is evident at the hospital when Hattie leaves Paris to comfort her niece and nephew while her sister is ill. Hattie demonstrates selflessness by putting her own life on the back burner to take her niece and nephew on a road trip to find their father. â€Å"You, me, Thebie, we’re going on a road trip, I said. We’re gonna look for Cherkis† (The Flying Troutmans, pg.52). These examples demonstrate Hattie’s devotion to strengthen the relationship in her family. Both novels provide notable progression of characters becoming more selfless and caring towards others. Both Amir and Hattie have many of the same characteristics, one being selflessness. Like Hattie, Amir also experienced moments of selflessness as a child. This is evident when Amir included his Hazara slave, Hassan, to participate with him in the kite running tournament. Amir considered Hassan as an equal, despite the cultural differences and the potential of social backlash. Assef said, â€Å"†¦you’re bothering me more than this Hazara her e. How can you talk to him, play with him, let him touch you?† (The Kite Runner, pg. 44). Like Hattie as an adult, in order to strengthen the relationship with his newfound nephew, Amir sacrifices his newly adjusted life in America to adopt Sohrab from the atrocious conditions in Afghanistan. Amir

Childhood Cancer Clusters in California’s Central Valley Free Essays

Childhood Cancer Clusters in California’s Central Valley Case report :Sakshi Arora March 22, 2012 This case study examines childhood cancers in agricultural communities of Mc Farland and Earlimart from 1978 to 1995. According to the local residents of these communities the main reason for cancer is contamination through pesticide in the agricultural farms which is the major source of employment for the residents of the community. McFarland is a small community in Kern County, with the population of about 6200, located at the southern end of California’s San Joaquin Valley. We will write a custom essay sample on Childhood Cancer Clusters in California’s Central Valley or any similar topic only for you Order Now They are the main source of cotton and Almond in the area. Census Data of 1980 revealed that 40 percent of the population is less than 18 years of age. Main source of employment of the population is the farms with the annual income of merely $4300. Due to the limited source of income they were incapable of having health insurance of themselves and the kids. it has been observed that since1978 to 1990, 14 children in McFarland have childhood cancer which is four times the expected rate. The cancers were of many different types including liver, kidney, eye, adrenal glands, and bone. By 1992, five of the children had died. The families of Mcfarland were disturbed and are in pain due to increasing numbers of the victims. Earlimart is another small farming community located in southern Tulare County about 15 miles north of McFarland in the San Joaquin Valley. Child population of the area is one-third of the adult population. It is surrounded by vineyards. In 1989, the United Farm Workers union uncovered a second cluster of twelve childhood cancers in Earlimart among children of farm workers. Study of Dr. Marion Moses, a medical consultant for the union, revealed that the cancers occurred in area is 12 times higher than estimated numbers. All the victims were not of same kind. Some of them had leukemia where some died of lymphoma or kidney cancer. â€Å"In adults, when you get different types of cancer, then most of the time it is not a Cluster,† It as really shocking as Cancer is rare disease in children, the main thought of question arise about the increasing number ignoring the type of cancer. According to the residents, pesticides are the main cause of increasing number of child death rate in the area. Mcfarland and Earlimart are small communities who are not engaged in lot of activities. Victim’s parents have been examined and most of them reported it is caused by pesticides whereas some residents living have reporte d that no such incident has been observed in their families. Their main occupation is agriculture in the farms where pesticide is being used. They have reported contamination of water is also one of the reasons for the cancer. The case unfolds the number of cases which happened with the people throughout the period. They also reported that in spite of informing the harmful effect of the pesticides to their boss . To which no action has been taken instead their interference in such matter would a reason of them to be fired from the job. The figures of The California Department of Food and Agriculture revealed that there are more than 1,200 cases in California alone in 1986 based on worker compensation records. Nationwide, one estimate calculated as many as 313,000 pesticide-related illnesses among farm worker each year. Dr. Marion Moses, a San Francisco physician active with farm worker groups and a member of the pesticide advisory committee of the Environmental Protection Agency said the main reason for cancer deaths has direct relationship with the pesticides being used in given county. In 1984, after the discovery of the cancer cluster in McFarland, United Farm Workers, Began a boycott on five chemicals being used on the crop such as phosdrin, captan, dinoseb, methyl bromide, and parathion which were found the main reason for situation. Concerned citizen groups from McFarland asked Kern County officials to look into the cancer cluster in their community. Within the year the investigation took over of California department of health services. After five years of their investigation on the area they came up with the conclusion that pesticide is not the reason for the cancer deaths in the area affected. despite of all the researches they were unable to find the specific cause for the situation. on the other hand farmers were confident about the reason for the same. They felt abandoned by the government as they didn’t see and drop of hope. Numbers have been significantly increasing every year. After years of study on the area department of health services decide d to stop their study as they didn’t determine the cause for the new cases of cancer every year. Proposition 65, officially known as the â€Å"Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act,†. It is based on the premise that the public and workers have a right to be informed about exposures to chemicals that are known to the state to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. According the proposition list of chemicals has been maintained with its effects to the people. According to the proposition it is the responsibility of the business to inform its employees, clearly about the effects of such materials used in the process. It should be reasonably defined. Also 20months after the pesticide is listed business must not knowingly discharge the waste material into soil or water. The State hazard communication program requires that, whenever employees are working in treated fields or handling pesticides, the employer must display Pesticide Safety Information Series (PSIS) leaflet A-9 (â€Å"Pesticide Safety Rules for Farmworkers â€Å"), PSIS A-8 (â€Å"Safety Rules for Pesticide Handlers on Farms), or PSIS N-8 (â€Å"Safety Rules for Pesticide Handlers in Non-Agricultural Settings â€Å") at the work site or at a central location where workers gather. The State hazard communication program requires that, whenever employees are working in treated fields or handling pesticides, the employer must display Pesticide Safety Information Series (PSIS) leaflet A-9 (â€Å"Pesticide Safety Rules for Farmworkers â€Å"), PSIS A-8 (â€Å"Safety Rules for Pesticide Handlers on Farms), or PSIS N-8 (â€Å"Safety Rules for Pesticide Handlers in Non-Agricultural Settings â€Å") at the work site or at a central location where workers gather. As the information gathered from the case report workers have not been informed about any of the above hazards of health. Also it is strange to observe that pesticides being used in the farms also listed in the list of chemicals under prop 65 which were hazardous are not been informed to the farmers. Also investigations done by the agency didn’t reveal the fact that the pesticides the main cause for the cancer in the area. Under prop 65 list of chemical it is clearly stated pesticide phosdrin causes cancer. I don’t hink the research on the contamination water, air and soil was done properly as none of the facts mentioned under prop 65 has been revealed. Neither list of chemicals has been listed by the farm owners to inform to the workers about the hazardous pesticides in the farm nor the researches revealed the facts. All these researches have been done but victim parents did not got any justice. Since they are poor they got no choice but to live on those farms to earn their living and lost their family members just like that. From 1978to 1990 the people suffered, 28 died . California department of health services took samples for examination, tested soil and air but result were not noticeable. They were only be able to analyses the situation today but couldn’t do anything for the innocent people died in last 12 years. Question arises from this study in the mind as to why this facts were not being examined after years of research by the state and county officials? Were they biased in making a decision? Although lot of research took place in the area but nothing proved fruitful and the mystery remained unsolved by the health department. Since 1992 no case has been examined but the above time period mentioned couldn’t reveal the facts of the history. Sources: Case report retrieved from http://www. law. stanford. edu/publications/casestudies/case_abstracts/ Pesticide and proposition 65 retrieved from http://www. cdpr. ca. gov/docs/dept/factshts/prop65. htm How to cite Childhood Cancer Clusters in California’s Central Valley, Essay examples

Example of a Recording Contract free essay sample

Company to produce Master Recordings of the Artists performances and market these Master Recordings. D. The Company wishes to produce and market the Master Recordings subject to the following terms and conditions Terms and Conditions 1 . The Term of this Agreement starts during the initial period of Insert Date during which the Artist and the Company will cooperate to produce Master Recordings suitable for the production of the Album or PEP and will continue for twelve months after the delivery of the Master Recording to allow the Company time o manufacture, market and distribute the product in the Territory. . The Company has the right to extend the Term of Agreement after the Initial Contract Period on the same terms In conditions as the Initial Contract Period. If the Company falls to exercise its option to renew an Optional Period the agreement will be deemed to be completed and fulfilled. 3. With any additional option periods and extensions the Company will relate these as periods referred toast additional Terms Production 4. We will write a custom essay sample on Example of a Recording Contract or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The company agrees to Produce Master Recordings consisting of songs written ND performed by the Artist. The resulting recording will include music of not less than 3 minutes in playing duration and will consist of not less than 12 tracks, and will be of a quality which Is at least equal to Industry standard for commercial distribution 5. Each Recording made will be subject to the Companys approval for manufacture and sale of industry standards. The artist agrees to re-record a record Exclusivity 6. The Artist will not re-record, remix, reproduce, manufacture or distribute or make available or allow to be made available in any manner any of the recordings or impositions generated under this agreement within 3 months after the termination of this agreement. Costs 7. The Company will pay for all the recording costs that are reasonable and generally accepted in the industry including, but not limited to, cost of producer, arranger, studio time, background musicians, as well as reasonable costs related to Album cover art, production and promotion.Selection Control 8. Selections in the agreement will be chosen in the Joint discretion of the Artist and Company. The Artist may submit material at all times. Copyright 9. The Company and parties authorized by the company will have the right to secure copyright in the Companys name as owner and author on any and all Master Recordings made under this Agreement and to renew such copyright in the Companys name in perpetuity.Distribution 10. The Company will have the exclusive rights to control over the distribution, promotion, and use of the Master Recordings throughout the Territory. Royalties 1 1 . The Company will endeavor to enter into a distribution agreement in order to commercially exploit the Recordings made under this agreement. The Company will collect the royalties and licensing fees with respect to the distribution of the recordings.